C. Mass remains constant during a chemical reaction
B. Accuracy and validity of findings
B. Phlogiston theory
B. Elements by their properties and atomic number
B. There is a 5% chance the results are incorrect
B. Rutherford model
B. Same results under the same conditions
B. Same results using different methods
B. Theory of combustion
B. Properties of elements
1.2 Short Response Questions
Mass is neither created nor destroyed in chemical reactions. Total mass of reactants equals total mass of products because atoms are rearranged, not changed in number (Lavoisier).
Empirical evidence comes from direct observation and experimentation. It forms the basis for hypotheses, testing, and conclusions, ensuring science is grounded in measurable reality.
Independent experts evaluate research for methodology, validity, and significance before publication. It ensures quality, detects errors, and maintains scientific integrity.
Combustible materials contain “phlogiston” released during burning. Air absorbs phlogiston; combustion stops when air is saturated.
Rutherford discovered the nucleus — tiny, dense, positive center with most mass, electrons orbiting at large distances. Explained alpha scattering and revolutionized atomic theory.
Elements are arranged by increasing atomic number in periods and groups. Same group elements have similar properties due to same valence electrons.
A paradigm is a shared framework of concepts guiding research. Example: phlogiston theory dominated 18th-century chemistry until replaced by oxygen theory.
It shows the probability that results are statistically significant (e.g., 95% confidence means only 5% chance results are due to random variation).
Repeatability: same scientist, same conditions → same results. Reproducibility: different scientists, different methods → same results.
Skepticism demands evidence, questions claims, and prevents flawed ideas. It promotes rigorous testing and self-correction in science.
1.3 Long Response Questions
The shift from phlogiston to oxygen theory was a major paradigm change in chemistry. Phlogiston theory (17th–18th century) claimed combustible materials contain “phlogiston” released during burning. Metals were compounds of phlogiston and calx (oxide); burning released phlogiston, leaving calx. Air absorbed phlogiston; combustion stopped when air was saturated. Problems: metals gained mass during calcination (contradicting phlogiston loss), and phlogiston was given negative mass to explain this — increasingly contrived. Antoine Lavoisier (late 18th century) used quantitative experiments in sealed containers. He showed combustion involves combination with air’s active part (oxygen). Burning phosphorus/sulfur gained mass equal to air absorbed. Metals gained mass from oxygen forming oxides. Respiration consumed oxygen. Lavoisier named oxygen (“acid former”) and stated combustion is oxidation. His 1789 textbook established modern chemistry. Impact: introduced mass conservation as fundamental law; made chemistry quantitative; explained oxidation-reduction; enabled stoichiometry; replaced qualitative phlogiston with precise oxygen theory; laid foundation for atomic theory and modern chemical nomenclature.
Atomic models evolved with new evidence. Thomson’s 1904 plum pudding model: atom as uniform positive sphere with embedded electrons (neutrality explained). Failed to explain alpha scattering. Rutherford’s 1911 gold foil experiment: most alpha particles passed through, some deflected/bounced back → atom mostly empty with tiny, dense, positive nucleus (most mass) and orbiting electrons. Explained scattering via Coulomb repulsion but couldn’t explain electron stability (classical physics predicted spiraling into nucleus). Bohr’s 1913 model: electrons in fixed energy levels/shells; jumps emit/absorb photons. Explained hydrogen spectrum but failed for multi-electron atoms. Quantum mechanical model (1920s, Schrödinger, Heisenberg): electrons as probability clouds/orbitals (wave-particle duality). Heisenberg uncertainty principle: position and momentum cannot be known precisely. Quantum numbers describe electron states. Model predicts behavior of all elements accurately. Each model incorporated new evidence, progressing from uniform sphere to nuclear structure to probabilistic quantum description.
Mendeleev’s 1869 periodic table arranged elements by atomic weight, grouping similar properties and predicting undiscovered elements (e.g., gallium, scandium, germanium matched predictions). Moseley’s 1913 atomic number refinement solidified it. As paradigm, it organizes knowledge, predicts properties (group trends: alkali metals reactive, halogens form salts), reveals periodic trends (radius, ionization energy, electronegativity). Guides synthesis, bonding understanding, and new element searches (transuranium elements followed table predictions). Reveals electron configuration link to properties (valence electrons determine reactivity). Remains chemistry’s central organizing tool, validated by discoveries and guiding research.
Repeatability (same scientist, identical conditions → consistent results) shows precision and reliability. Reproducibility (different scientists, methods → same results) confirms robustness and generality. Both prevent errors, bias, fraud. Repeatability detects experimental variation; reproducibility validates broadly. Replication crises (psychology, some chemistry) led to preregistration, data sharing, negative result publication. In chemistry, reproducible syntheses, analyses, and theories are essential for trust and application (pharma, industry). Ensures cumulative knowledge, self-correction, and progress.
Uncertainty arises from instrument limits, sample variation, etc. Confidence intervals show range likely containing true value (95% confidence: 95% of intervals from repeated experiments contain true value). Example: calcium in water 45.2 ± 0.3 mg/L (95% CI) → true value between 44.9–45.5 mg/L. Standard deviation measures data spread; small → high precision. Standard error of mean decreases with more measurements. Calibration curves have error bars/confidence bands. Uncertainty propagates in calculations. t-tests assess significance at confidence levels. Expressing uncertainty shows rigor, allows proper interpretation, and prevents over-confidence in results.
1.4 Summary of Key Concepts
Concept
Description
Conservation of Mass
Mass constant in reactions (Lavoisier)
Phlogiston Theory
18th-century combustion paradigm
Oxygen Theory
Lavoisier’s replacement: combustion with oxygen
Rutherford Model
Nucleus with orbiting electrons
Periodic Table
Organizes elements by atomic number, properties
Peer Review
Expert evaluation for quality/validity
Repeatability
Same scientist, same conditions, same results
Reproducibility
Different scientists, different methods, same results
Confidence Level
Statistical reliability (e.g., 95%)
Empirical Evidence
Knowledge from observation/experiment
Chapter 2: Matter
1.1 Multiple Choice Questions
C. It increases
C. Sublimation
B. A fixed temperature
B. Lose energy and move slower
B. Charles’s Law
A. Evaporation occurs at the surface of a liquid at any temperature
D. The temperature increases
D. Only temperature and molecular mass
C. Sublimation
B. It ensures the medicine reaches all parts of the body
1.2 Short Response Questions
Heat energy is used to break intermolecular forces, allowing molecules to escape as gas without raising temperature.
Particles in constant motion; kinetic energy determines state.
Cooling curve plots temperature vs time during cooling.
Diffusion is spontaneous spreading of particles from high to low concentration.
Evaporation at surface, any temperature; boiling throughout, specific temperature.
Graham’s law: rate inversely proportional to square root of molar mass.
Sublimation: solid to gas without liquid phase.
Charles’s law: volume proportional to temperature at constant pressure.
Boyle’s law: pressure inversely proportional to volume at constant temperature.
Kinetic theory explains states by particle motion and forces.
1.3 Long Response Questions
Kinetic particle theory states particles in constant motion; energy determines state.
Cooling curve plots temperature vs time; plateaus at phase changes.
Diffusion is spontaneous spreading; factors: temperature, mass, medium.
1.4 Think Tank
Boiling occurs when vapor pressure equals atmospheric; factors affect rate.
Diffusion rates critical in drug development for absorption.
Sublimation offers controlled phase change in pharma.
1.5 Summary of Key Concepts
Concept
Description
Kinetic Particle Theory
Particles in constant motion; energy determines state
Evaporation
Liquid to gas at surface
Boiling
Liquid to gas throughout
Sublimation
Solid to gas
Diffusion
Spreading from high to low concentration
Graham’s Law
Rate ∝ 1/√molar mass
Charles’s Law
V ∝ T
Boyle’s Law
P ∝ 1/V
Chapter 3: Stoichiometry
1.1 Multiple Choice Questions
B. 1.0
B. 24 dm³
D. 7 moles of atoms in total
A. 106 g/mol
C. Limiting reactant
A. NH₃
D. 3.01 × 10²³
B. Diamond
D. Number of molecules
B. 13 mol
1.2 Short Questions
Assume 100 g sample: C: 65.45 g / 12 = 5.454 mol; H: 5.45 g / 1 = 5.45 mol; N: 29.1 g / 14 = 2.078 mol. Divide by smallest: C: 2.626, H: 2.623, N: 1 → empirical C₅H₅N₂ (approx).
Molar mass = 12n + 1n = 13n = 65 → n = 5, molecular C₅H₅.
Moles = mass / molar mass.
Limiting reactant limits product amount.
Percentage yield = (actual / theoretical) × 100.
Avogadro’s number = 6.02 × 10²³.
1 dm³ = 1000 cm³.
STP: 0°C, 1 atm; molar volume 22.4 dm³.
Allotropes: different forms same element (diamond/graphite).
Isotopes: same protons, different neutrons.
Empirical from percentages; molecular from molar mass.
Stoichiometry: quantitative relations in reactions.
Theoretical yield from balanced equation.
Actual yield < theoretical due to losses.
1.3 Think Tank
Percentage yield rarely 100% due to side reactions, losses.
Add additional solute to reach 1.0 mol/dm³.
Na₂CO₃ + 2HCl → products.
M(H₂SO₄) = 98 g/mol.
Acid-base titration with standardized NaOH.
1.4 Summary of Key Formulas
Formula
Description
Moles = mass / molar mass
Calculate moles from mass
Percentage composition
(Mass element / molar mass) × 100
Empirical formula
Simplest ratio from percentages
Molecular formula
Empirical × n (n = molar mass / empirical mass)
Limiting reactant
Reactant with least product moles
Percentage yield
(Actual / theoretical) × 100
Avogadro’s number
6.02 × 10²³ particles/mol
Molar volume STP
22.4 dm³/mol
Chapter 4: Electrochemistry
1.1 Multiple Choice Questions
C. Electrons flow from cathode to anode
A. Half-cell of an active metal acts as a cathode
D. Reduction of metal oxide by a reducing agent
B. Coating with Zn
B. Chlorine gas is produced at anode
B. Coating a metal object with a thin layer of metal through electrolysis
B. Maintaining electrical neutrality by allowing ion movement
B. Metal B is more reactive than metal A
1.2 Short Questions
A fuel cell is an electrochemical cell converting chemical energy to electricity.
Oxidation: loss of electrons; reduction: gain.
Redox: oxidation + reduction.
Galvanization: zinc coating to prevent rust.
Electroplating: depositing metal layer via electrolysis.
Salt bridge: maintains neutrality.
Cathode: reduction; anode: oxidation.
Electrolytic cell: non-spontaneous, needs energy.
1.3 Long Questions
Oxidation: gain oxygen/loss electrons; examples.
(sketch description)
Lead from PbCl₂ via electrolysis.
With copper electrodes: reactions.
(a) (sketch) (b) Electrolysis non-spontaneous.
a. Anode: Cu → Cu²⁺ + 2e⁻.
Cathode: water reduced.
Molten PbCl₂: Pb cathode, Cl₂ anode.
Molten PbCl₂ electrolysis.
(i) H₂, O₂ (ii) Cu, Cl₂ (iii) Pb, Br₂
Conc NaCl (inert): NaOH, Cl₂, H₂.
1.4 Page 62 Questions
Fe oxidized, O reduced.
(i) Br₂ (ii) I₂ vapors.
(i) H₂, O₂ (ii) Cu, Cl₂ (iii) Pb, Br₂
1.5 Summary of Key Concepts
Concept
Description
Oxidation
Loss of electrons/gain oxygen
Reduction
Gain electrons/loss oxygen
Redox
Oxidation + reduction
Galvanic Cell
Spontaneous redox
Electrolytic Cell
Non-spontaneous, driven by electricity
Galvanization
Zn coating for corrosion protection
Electroplating
Metal deposition via electrolysis
Salt Bridge
Ion flow for neutrality
Chapter 5: Chemical Kinetics
1.1 Multiple Choice Questions
B. Decreases
D. None of these
B. Slow
C. Forward as well as reverse reaction
D. Molar mass of reactants
D. By providing an alternate pathway with lower activation energy
D. Colour of the reactants
B. Change in pressure
B. Increases the rate of reaction
D. Higher temperature increases the frequency of collisions and kinetic energy of particles
1.2 Short Questions
(energy diagram)
Collision theory: reactions from collisions with energy.
Activation energy: minimum for reaction.
Catalyst: lowers activation energy.
Temperature increases rate by more collisions/energy.
Concentration increases rate by more collisions.
Surface area increases rate for solids.
Pressure increases rate for gases.
Light increases rate in photochemical.
Reversible: forward/reverse.
Forward: reactants to products.
Reverse: products to reactants.
Rate law: rate = k [reactants]^n
Order: exponent in rate law.
Half-life: time for half concentration.
1.3 Long Questions
Concentration vs time graph.
Supported by collision theory.
Catalyst increases rate, alternate path.
Temperature profound effect.
Kinetics in food industry.
Hypothesis: temp/surface area effect.
(not in query)
Catalyst in pharma.
Objective: compare pharma rate.
Maximize rate per collision theory.
Similarities: increase rate.
Activation energy importance.
1.4 Think Tank
(a) Catalyst ineffective scenarios. (b) Kinetics in food production. (c) Double surface double rate. (d) Gas formation associated.
1.5 Summary of Key Concepts
Concept
Description
Collision Theory
Reactions occur when particles collide with sufficient energy
Activation Energy
Minimum energy for reaction
Catalyst
Lowers activation energy
Rate Law
Rate = k [A]^m [B]^n
Order of Reaction
Sum of exponents in rate law
Half-Life
Time for concentration to halve
Chapter 6: Salts
1.1 Multiple Choice Questions
C. Sodium nitrate (NaNO₃)
A. Negative ions
B. Strong electrostatic forces
C. Molten
C. Chlorides are soluble except lead and silver chlorides
C. They become mobile
D. Acid + Alkali
D. Lead chloride (PbCl₂)
B. Salt and water
B. NO₃⁻
1.2 Short Questions
Salt: ionic compound from acid H⁺ replaced by metal.
Normal: complete H⁺ replacement.
Acidic: partial H⁺ replacement.
Basic: from weak acid/strong base.
Double: two cations/anions.
Mixed: two acids/bases.
Soluble: nitrates, Na/K salts.
Insoluble: Ag/Pb chlorides.
Preparation methods: titration, precipitation.
1.3 Long Questions
Titration for soluble salts.
Salts solid at STP.
Solubility rules predict dissolution.
Ionic lattice from bonding.
Method for insoluble carbonate.
1.4 Think Tank
Prepare MgSO₄ crystals.
KOH + H₂SO₄ titration.
Always soluble: nitrates, Na salts.
Prepare CuSO₄ from CuCO₃.
CuSO₄ from H₂SO₄.
1.5 Summary of Key Concepts
Concept
Description
Salt
Ionic compound from acid H⁺ replaced by metal
Normal Salt
All H⁺ replaced
Acid Salt
Partial H⁺ replacement
Basic Salt
Weak acid/strong base
Solubility Rules
Predict salt dissolution
Titration
For soluble salts
Precipitation
For insoluble salts
Chapter 7: Nitrogen, Sulphur and Metals
1.1 Multiple Choice Questions
B. Peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN)
D. 2N₂(g) + 3H₂(g) ⇌ 2NH₃(g)
B. Methane and air
C. Iron
B. 450°C
B. 2SO₂(g) + O₂(g) ⇌ 2SO₃(g)
B. Vanadium(V) oxide
A. Burning sulphur or roasting sulphide ores
A. Forming a salt and water
D. Al₂O₃
1.2 Short Questions
PAN: secondary pollutant from NOₓ/VOCs.
NOₓ: air pollutants from combustion.
Haber process: ammonia production.
Contact process: H₂SO₄ production.
Acidic oxide: reacts with base.
Basic oxide: reacts with acid.
Amphoteric oxide: both acid/base.
Neutral oxide: no reaction.
Reactivity series: metals by reactivity.
Extraction: from ores.
Corrosion: metal deterioration.
Galvanization: Zn coating.
1.3 Long Questions
NOₓ pollutants: sources, effects.
Haber process details.
Contact process details.
Oxides classification.
Haber/Contact environmental impact.
NO/N₂O acid rain contribution.
Oxide acidity by position.
1.4 Think Tank
Gold/platinum for jewellery.
New metal in reactivity series.
Reactivity series A>B>C.
Basic oxides uses.
Haber 450°C/200 atm choice.
Acidic oxides environmental impact.
Controlling NOₓ/SO₂ emissions.
1.5 Summary of Key Concepts
Concept
Description
Haber Process
N₂ + 3H₂ ⇌ 2NH₃, Fe catalyst, 450°C, 200 atm
Contact Process
SO₂ to SO₃, V₂O₅ catalyst
Acidic Oxide
Reacts with base
Basic Oxide
Reacts with acid
Amphoteric Oxide
Reacts with both
Reactivity Series
K > Na > Ca > Mg > Al > Zn > Fe > Sn > Pb > H > Cu > Ag > Au
Corrosion
Metal oxidation
Chapter 8: Organic Chemistry
1.1 Multiple Choice Questions
A. CH₃CH=CHCH₃
B. Butan-1-ol
A. Butanoic acid
B. They have the same molecular formula
A. Methyl propanoate
C. Butan-1-ol
B. -COOH
B. CH₃COOCH₂CH₂CH₂CH₃
A. CH₃CH₂CH₂CH₂OH
B. Propan-2-ol
A. But-2-ene: CH₃CH=CHCH₃
1.2 Short Questions
Displayed structural formula shows arrangement.
IUPAC naming rules.
Alkene: C=C.
Alcohol: -OH.
Carboxylic acid: -COOH.
Ester: -COO-.
Structural isomers: same formula, different structure.
Functional isomers: same formula, different group.
Position isomers: group different position.
Chain isomers: carbon chain different.
Esterification: alcohol + acid → ester.
Saponification: ester hydrolysis.
Homologous series: similar properties.
Organic compounds classification.
1.3 Long Questions
Functional groups determine properties.
Distinguish alkenes/alcohols/acids.
Alcohol + carboxylic acid reaction.
Ethanol + propanoic acid esterification.
Methyl methanoate etc.
Suffixes indicate type.
Esters/carboxylic acids differences.
(table)
1.4 Think Tank
Decision tree for identification.
C₄H₁₀O isomers.
1.5 Summary of Key Concepts
Compound Type
Functional Group
Suffix
Example
Alkane
None
-ane
Butane (C₄H₁₀)
Alkene
C=C
-ene
Butene (C₄H₈)
Alcohol
-OH
-ol
Butanol (C₄H₉OH)
Carboxylic Acid
-COOH
-oic acid
Butanoic acid (C₃H₇COOH)
Ester
-COO-
-oate
Methyl butanoate (C₃H₇COOCH₃)
For more Class 10 NBF Chemistry notes, visit HSA Notes. Updated for 2026 exams.